HPE7-A06최신업데이트버전인증덤프 - HPE7-A06최고품질인증시험공부자료

2025 KoreaDumps 최신 HPE7-A06 PDF 버전 시험 문제집과 HPE7-A06 시험 문제 및 답변 무료 공유: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1C4JxxMieEDqtcrkg_1YxwftLjnY_m3Z3

KoreaDumps의 HP HPE7-A06덤프를 공부하면 100% HP HPE7-A06 시험패스를 보장해드립니다. 만약 HP HPE7-A06 덤프자료를 구매하여 공부한후 시험에 탈락할시 불합격성적표와 주문번호를 메일로 보내오시면 덤프비용을 바로 환불해드립니다. 저희 KoreaDumps HP HPE7-A06덤프로 자격증부자되세요.

HP HPE7-A06인증시험패스에는 많은 방법이 있습니다. 먼저 많은 시간을 투자하고 신경을 써서 전문적으로 과련 지식을 터득한다거나; 아니면 적은 시간투자와 적은 돈을 들여 KoreaDumps의 인증시험덤프를 구매하는 방법 등이 있습니다.

>> HPE7-A06최신 업데이트버전 인증덤프 <<

HPE7-A06최고품질 인증시험공부자료 - HPE7-A06시험패스 가능 덤프자료

HP HPE7-A06덤프의 유효성을 보장해드릴수 있도록 저희 기술팀은 오랜시간동안HP HPE7-A06시험에 대하여 분석하고 연구해 왔습니다. HP HPE7-A06 덤프를 한번 믿고HP HPE7-A06시험에 두려움없이 맞서보세요. 만족할수 있는 좋은 성적을 얻게 될것입니다.

최신 Aruba Certified Professional - Campus Access HPE7-A06 무료샘플문제 (Q39-Q44):

질문 # 39
When using the cable diagnostic feature on an AOS-CX switch to test a 1000BaseT connection, whatthe accuracy of 'distance to fault"?

A. +/- 2m
B. +/-6m
C. +/- 10m
D. +/-1m

정답：D

설명：
The question asks about the accuracy of the 'distance to fault' measurement provided by the cable diagnostic feature (using Time Domain Reflectometry - TDR) on an AOS-CX switch for a 1000BaseT connection.
* TDR Accuracy:TDR works by sending a signal down the cable and measuring the time it takes for reflections to return, which indicates faults like opens or shorts. The accuracy depends on the quality of the TDR circuitry, the calibration,and the cable characteristics. Network equipment vendors typically specify the expected accuracy.
* AOS-CX Specification:According to HPE Aruba Networking documentation for AOS-CX switches, the accuracy of the TDR-based cable diagnostics for distance to fault on copper cabling is typically specified as +/- 1 meter.
* Analysis of Options:
* A: +/- 10m - Too inaccurate.
* B: +/- 2m - Less accurate than specified.
* C: +/- 6m - Too inaccurate.
* D: +/- 1m - Matches the documented accuracy for AOS-CX TDR.
References:AOS-CX Fundamentals Guide, AOS-CX CLI Reference Guide (under diag cable-diagnostic command description or general troubleshooting sections). This relates to the "Troubleshooting" (10%) objective.

질문 # 40
An administrator is monitoringthird-party WLAN transmitters m HPE Aruba Networking Central and some of them are classified as rogue and suspected rogue How aresuspected rogues classified when using the default classification method for the rule "Suspected AP On-Prem" in HPE Aruba Networking Central?

A. signal level = "-50 dbM" ANDWLAN classification = "On Wire"
B. signal level = "-55 dbM" AND WLAN classification =''Interfering"
C. signal level = '-65 dbM- AND WLAN classification ="On-Prem"
D. signal level ="-50 dbM" AND WLAN classification = "Interfering"

정답：C

설명：
The question asks how suspected rogue APs are classified using the default classification method for the
"Suspected AP On-Prem" rule in HPE Aruba Networking Central.
* Analysis of Options:
* Option A:Correct. Suspected rogues are classified with a signal level of -65 dBm (indicating proximity) and WLAN classification of "On-Prem" (indicating they are on the premises).
* Option B:Incorrect. A signal level of -55 dBm is too strong, and "Interfering" is not specific to on-premises rogues.
* Option C:Incorrect. A signal level of -50 dBm is even stronger, and "Interfering" is incorrect.
* Option D:Incorrect. "On Wire" classification applies to wired rogue detection, not wireless on- premises APs.
* Why Option A is Correct:In HPE Aruba Networking Central, the "Suspected AP On-Prem" rule identifies rogue APs based on their signal strength and location. A signal level of -65 dBm indicates the AP is close enough to be on the premises, and the "On-Prem" classification confirms it's detected within the managed network's environment. This default rule helps identify potential security threats by flagging unauthorized APs with moderate to strong signals, distinguishing them from interfering or distant APs, as per Aruba's wireless security framework.
* Relevance to Certification Objectives:
* WLAN (9%):Designing and troubleshooting RF attributes and wireless security functions.
* Security (10%):Troubleshooting and identifying rogue APs in customer networks.
* Troubleshooting (10%):Analyzing wireless issues using Aruba Central tools.
References:
HPE Aruba Networking Central User Guide: Rogue AP Detection and Classification.
HPE7-A06Study Guide: Covers wireless security and rogue AP management.
HPE Aruba Networking Technical Documentation: Wireless Security and Rogue Detection Best Practices.

질문 # 41
Refer to the exhibit.

Acme Corp has VM workload running downstream of ToR-1 and has noticed performance degradation. They suspect ToR-1 uplinks are periodically over utilized. A partner has suggested you migrate your legacy 1U Coie-1 and Cote-2 to the CX 6400 series.
Which aspects of this platform would solve the customer's problem, while focusing on implementing HPE Aruba Networking best practices? (Select two.)

A. The proposed new core's VSF capabilityallows multiple active forwarding pathways from ToR-1 based while eliminating the need for STP.
B. The proposed solutions backplane stacking permits the directly connected ESXI hosts to load balance using active LACP.
C. The CX 6400 series supports multiple active forwardingpathways from ToR-1 based on multi-region design.
D. MC-LAG permits Core-1 and Core-2 to present the edge 602.3ad device as a common system ID"

정답：A,D

설명：
The question involves a customer experiencing performance degradation due to periodic overutilization of ToR-1 uplinks to legacy Core-1 and Core-2 switches. The proposed solution is to migrate to CX 6400 series switches, and the task is to identify which aspects of the CX 6400 platform address the issue while adhering to HPE Aruba Networking best practices.
* Analysis of Options:
* Option A:Incorrect. The CX 6400 does not support "multi-region design" as a feature for active forwarding pathways.
* Option B:Correct. Virtual Switching Framework (VSF) on the CX 6400 allows multiple active forwarding pathways by creating a single logical switch from multiple physical switches, eliminating the need for STP in the core and reducing uplink congestion.
* Option C:Incorrect. Backplane stacking does not directly enable ESXi hosts to load balance using active LACP; this is unrelated to uplink utilization.
* Option D:Correct. Multi-Chassis Link Aggregation (MC-LAG) allows Core-1 and Core-2 to form a single logical 802.3ad (LACP) device, enabling active-active uplinks from ToR-1 and load balancing traffic to prevent overutilization.
* Why B and D are Correct:The performance degradation is caused by uplink overutilization, likely due to STP blocking redundant paths or inefficient load balancing. The CX 6400's VSF capability combines multiple switches into a single logical device, allowing all uplinks from ToR-1 to be active without relying on STP, which often blocks redundant paths. MC-LAG further enhances this by presenting Core-1 and Core-2 as a single LACP system, enabling ToR-1 to use all uplinks actively via LACP load balancing. These features align with HPE Aruba Networking best practices for high-availability and performance in campus core deployments.
* Relevance to Certification Objectives:
* Network Resiliency and Virtualization (8%):Designing and troubleshooting VSF and MC- LAG for resiliency and redundancy.
* Performance Optimization (6%):Analyzing and remediating uplink utilization issues.
* Connectivity (9%):Applying advanced networking architectures like VSF and MC-LAG.
References:
HPE Aruba Networking AOS-CX Configuration Guide: VSF and MC-LAG Configuration, detailing active forwarding and load balancing.
HPE7-A06Study Guide: Covers core switch resiliency and performance optimization.
HPE Aruba Networking Technical Documentation: CX 6400 Series Deployment Best Practices.

질문 # 42
Exhibit.

VSX cluster is already configured. Your task is to validate a correct configuration for the Edge-1 switch that is connected to a CCTV provider that will install its switching infrastructure. The CCTV switches do not support STP.
What needs to be configured on the Edge-1 switch ports connecting to CCTV-SW1 and CCTV-SW2 to prevent loop problems with the existing setup with automatic recovery features?

A. configure spanning-tree and TCN-guard timeout for CCTV switch ports
B. configure spanning-tree with udld for CCTV switch ports
C. configure lag with lacp fallback for CCTV switch ports
D. configure spanning-tree with bpdu-guard timeout values for CCTV switch ports

정답：D

설명：
The requirement is to prevent loops on Edge-1 switch ports connected to third-party CCTV switches that do notsupport STP. The solution must also include an automatic recovery feature if a port gets disabled.
* Loop Prevention without STP:When connecting to non-STP devices, standard STP loop prevention (like BPDU Guard) might not work if the connected device doesn't send BPDUs. AOS-CX offers a feature called loop-protect which sends probes to detect loops in non-STP environments.
* Automatic Recovery:Features that disable ports (like BPDU Guard or Loop Protect) often have a timeout or auto-recovery option (port-disable-timer for Loop Protect) allowing the port to automatically re-enable after a configured period.
* Analysis of Options:
* A: LACP fallback applies to LAGs, not general loop prevention.
* B: TCN-guard is an STP feature, irrelevant here.
* C: Suggests spanning-tree with bpdu-guard timeout. BPDU Guard detects loops by listening for BPDUs, which these CCTV switches don't send. However, the timeout featuredoesprovide the required automatic recovery mechanism if the portweredisabled by BPDU Guard.
* D: UDLD detects unidirectional links, not typically bridging loops caused by topology.
* Re-evaluation:The ideal AOS-CX feature is loop-protect with port-disable-timer. Since this isn't explicitly an option, we must evaluate the given choices. Option C is theonlyone that mentions a mechanism (bpdu-guard timeout) providing automatic recovery from a disabled state. While BPDU Guard isn't the right detection mechanism here, it's the closest fit regarding the auto- recoveryrequirement. It's possible the question implicitly assumes some stray BPDUs might trigger it or that it's the intended "best fit" answer despite the detection mechanism mismatch.
* Conclusion:Given the options, Option C is the most plausible because it includes the timeout feature associated with bpdu-guard, fulfilling the automatic recovery requirement, even though BPDU guard itself is not the ideal detection method for loops involving non-STP devices.
References:AOS-CX Spanning Tree Protocol Guide (BPDU Guard, Timeout), AOS-CX Interface Configuration Guide (loop-protect feature). This relates to "Switching" (19%) and "Network Resiliency and virtualization" (8%) objectives.

질문 # 43
Refer to the exhibit.

IGMP v3 was enabled on both VSX switches. Which switch becomes the IGMP querier forclients connected to Ace-1 switch?

A. Agg-2
B. Active gateway IP will be used as IGMP querier.
C. Agg-1
D. both Agg-1 and Agg-2

정답：C

설명：
The setup has Agg-1 and Agg-2 as a VSX pair with IGMPv3 enabled. Ace-1 is a downstream switch connected to clients. The question asks which switch becomes the IGMP querier for clients connected to Ace-
1.
* IGMP Snooping & Querier:In a Layer 2 network using IGMP snooping, an IGMP querier is required on each VLAN to periodically send general queries. This prompts hosts to send membership reports, allowing snooping switches to learn which ports need which multicast streams.
* Querier Election:If multiple devices capable of querying exist on a VLAN (like routers or capable switches), an election occurs. Typically, the device with the lowest IP address on the VLAN becomes the querier.
* VSX & IGMP Querier:In an ArubaOS-CX VSX environment, the IGMP querier functionality is managed by the VSX pair. Documentation indicates that theprimary VSX switchtypically assumes the role of the IGMP querier for the VLANs it serves, including those extended via MC-LAG to downstream switches.
* Analysis of Options:
* A. Agg-2: Would only be the querier if it were the primary VSX switch.
* B. Both Agg-1 and Agg-2: Incorrect, only one active querier per VLAN is standard.
* C. Agg-1: Likely the primary VSX switch (often designated or wins election based on priority
/lower system MAC/IP) and thus becomes the querier.
* D. Active gateway IP: This is the virtual IP used for unicast routing, but the querier function runs on a physical switch, usually the primary.
* Conclusion:Assuming Agg-1 is the primary VSX switch (as is common convention or based on default election parameters if not explicitly configured), it will act as the IGMP querier for the VLAN serving clients connected to Ace-1.
References:AOS-CX Multicast Guide (IGMP Snooping, Querier Election), AOS-CX VSX Guide. This relates to "Switching" (19%) and "Network Resiliency and virtualization" (8%).

질문 # 44
......

HP HPE7-A06 덤프구매전 한국어 온라인상담서비스부터 구매후 덤프 무료 업데이트버전제공 , HP HPE7-A06시험불합격시 덤프비용 전액환불 혹은 다른 과목으로 교환 등 저희는 구매전부터 구매후까지 철저한 서비스를 제공해드립니다. HP HPE7-A06 덤프는 인기덤프인데 지금까지 덤프를 구매한후 환불신청하신 분은 아직 없었습니다.

HPE7-A06최고품질 인증시험공부자료: https://www.koreadumps.com/HPE7-A06_exam-braindumps.html

HPE7-A06시험이 많이 어려운 시험일가요, 우리를 선택함으로 자신의 시간을 아끼는 셈이라고 생각하시면 됩니다.HP HPE7-A06로 빠른시일내에 자격증 취득하시고HPIT업계중에 엘리트한 전문가되시기를 바랍니다, HP HPE7-A06최신 업데이트버전 인증덤프 저희 사이트에서는 한국어 온라인상담과 메일상담 서비스를 제공해드립니다, 저희 HPE7-A06덤프로 HPE7-A06시험에 도전해보지 않으실래요, HPE7-A06덤프로 공부하여 HPE7-A06시험에서 불합격받으시면 바로 덤프비용전액 환불처리 해드리는 서비스를 제공해드리기에 아무런 부담없는 HPE7-A06시험준비공부를 할수 있습니다, HPE7-A06최고품질 인증시험공부자료 - HPE Campus Access Switching Expert Written Exam덤프는 세가지 버전으로 되어있는데 PDF버전을 구매하시는 분이 가장 많습니다.

아가씨가 영 네 맘에 안 차, 알려주겠다고, HPE7-A06시험이 많이 어려운 시험일가요, 우리를 선택함으로 자신의 시간을 아끼는 셈이라고 생각하시면 됩니다.HP HPE7-A06로 빠른시일내에 자격증 취득하시고HPIT업계중에 엘리트한 전문가되시기를 바랍니다.

HPE7-A06최신 업데이트버전 인증덤프 시험준비에 가장 좋은 기출문제 모은 덤프자료

저희 사이트에서는 한국어 온라인상담과 메일상담 서비스를 제공해드립니다, 저희 HPE7-A06덤프로 HPE7-A06시험에 도전해보지 않으실래요, HPE7-A06덤프로 공부하여 HPE7-A06시험에서 불합격받으시면 바로 덤프비용전액 환불처리 해드리는 서비스를 제공해드리기에 아무런 부담없는 HPE7-A06시험준비공부를 할수 있습니다.

참고: KoreaDumps에서 Google Drive로 공유하는 무료 2025 HP HPE7-A06 시험 문제집이 있습니다: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1C4JxxMieEDqtcrkg_1YxwftLjnY_m3Z3